Marketing | Environment | Culture

Category: Environment (Page 5 of 5)

environment, nature, outdoors, hiking, sustainability

Local History, Local Artist and Landscape Art

Three things I truly enjoy intersect just 2 miles from our home: local history, a local artist and landscape art.

Physically, they intersect at Tejon and Vermijo in downtown Colorado Springs.

The Pioneers Museum is dedicated to local history, including the settlement and development of the Colorado Springs area.  Its home is the former El Paso County Courthouse; one of the exhibits is a fully restored courtroom.  It used to be open from 10am-5pm every day of the week, but the city budget is an absolute wreck.  It’s always free to the public and absolutely worth a visit by locals and visitors alike.

The Pioneers Museum, downtown Colorado Springs, Colorado, history museum, local history

The Pioneers Museum in downtown Colorado Springs is housed in the former El Paso County Courthouse

One of my favorite exhibits is “Looming Large: The Artistic Legacy of Pikes Peak,” which was developed during the 2006 bicentennial of Zebulon Montgomery Pike’s expedition up the southwestern slopes of America’s Mountain.  It’s a room filled with various artistic renderings of the mountain that now bears Pike’s name.  One painting truly stands out from the rest and earns prominent placement.

Pioneers Museum, entrance to Looming Large exhibit

Entrance to the Looming Large exhibit at the Pioneers Museum

The oil painting is “Pikes Peak 2004” by Tracy Felix, who grew up and worked as an artist in Colorado Springs.  Within the past few years, he and his wife, artist Sushe Felix, moved to Denver.

Pikes Peak 2004 by Tracy Felix, Colorado Springs, painting, artist, oil painting

Pikes Peak 2004 by Tracy Felix

Perhaps for my love of mountains, wilderness and trails, I’ve always favored landscape photography and landscape painting over most other artistic forms.  Fold in the fact that the artist is local and the subject is Colorado mountains and I’m all in.

The style here is obviously bright, playful and inviting.  Though this treatment of Pikes Peak is relatively straightforward, much of his other work is a bit more abstract.

His work hangs at the Denver Art Museum, the Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center and the Sangre de Cristo Arts & Conference Center in Pueblo, among other places.

Here’s a sampling of Felix’s treatment of other Colorado landmarks.

Tracy Felix, painting, fine art, Black Canyon of the Gunnison, Mount Yale, Maroon Bells

Black Canyon of the Gunnison, Mount Yale, Maroon Bells

Tracy Felix, painting, oil painting, fine art, Sangres, Sangre de Cristo, mountain range, Longs Peak

Longs Peak, Sangre de Cristo Mountains

With this post, I simply wanted to draw your attention to a few things I enjoy that happen to intersect.

Related Links:

Pioneers Museum: home

Pioneers Museum: about

Pioneers Museum: exhibits

Pioneers Museum: photos from my Flickr stream

Tracy Felix: artist statement

Tracy Felix: gallery

Enjoy!

Positive Outcome from Dubious Marketing Ploy

A note on a dubious markeing ploy …

I’m “friends” with Colorado Governor Bill Ritter on Facebook.  I’m not sure how or when this happened, but, as a positive consequence, I get some useful info about goings-on at the state level.  Because of this “relationship,” I was treated to this in my Facebook News Feed yesterday morning:

Zeitgeist Movement Colorado tags Governor Bill Ritter on Facebook

Zeitgeist Movement Colorado tags Governor Bill Ritter

Like many of his 4,868 other “friends,” I watched the video out of curiosity alone.  “We are all connected” … sounds interesting!

As it turns out, the Governor appeared nowhere in this video, which was a fascinating production – particularly the audio mix.  Among those who did appear, probably without their knowledge or permission, were Bill Nye the Science Guy, Neil deGrasse Tyson (PBS), Carl Sagan and Richard Fenynman.  The video became repetitive, running about 2:00 too long.

Obviously, the tagging of the Governor by a member of the movement was a tactic to get attention – a “spray and pray” effort to cast a message as widely as possible by whatever means available with the hope that a target will be struck.  The downside: this runs against new, targeted, permission-based marketing principles.  The lamentable upside: it actually works …  I’m writing about it right now (!?).

So what is this Zeitgeist Movement that made its way into my consciousness by way of a dubious marketing ploy?  They seem to have semi-laudable but wildly impractical goals/ideals.  They call for a “sustainable social design” built on a “resource-based economy.”  Those are nice-sounding phrases.  It’s all based on the life’s work of industrial designer and social engineer Jaques Fresco.

I say it’s “laudable” because their critique of the status quo is harsh, highlighting the ugliest things about the way we live, work and “prosper.”  Also laudable are emphases on: world as singular organism, humans as singlular family, dependence upon healthy environment, natural processes, and the scientific method.  Per their intro video, they endorse the “humane application of science and technology to social design and decision making.”

I judge it “impractical” because it seeks a complete and fundamental redesign of all the world’s social and economic structures; its coming to pass seems wholly impossible given human nature.

In hindsight, I’m glad my Facebook News Feed was “hijacked” by a fallacious video tag.

They’re “out there.”  They’re disconnected in nearly every way from mainstream thought.  They’re imagining an experience, even existence, here on earth completely unlike what it is today.  I expect that this separation from mainstream is a primary reason they resort to such tactics.

A positive outcome: they reminded me of something valuable.  We owe it to ourselves to consider every now and again how our fellow human beings are thinking and dreaming differently.

I never endorse such tactics, but I always endorse thinking, dreaming and listening.

Here’s their US homepage:  Zeitgeist Movement

Here’s a video introduction:  Zeitgeist Movement

What I Want in a Purchase

Says what it is.  Does what it says.  Solves your problem.  Exceeds your expectations.  That’s all I want in a purchase – how about you?

I really love to hike and to climb mountains.  I don’t do it as often as I would like, but I appreciate every opportunity I get.

Several times in fall or spring, I’ve been out in conditions in which snowshoes would have been a serious benefit.  I’d casually surveyed the market for several months, never quite serious enough to commit to a purchase.  A friend recommended the MSR Lightning Ascent.

MSR Lightning Ascent Snowshoe 22" Orange

MSR Lightning Ascent

It’s a serious product.  Cut from aerospace-grade aluminum.  Lightest in its class.  Heel lift to support steep climbs.  A “total traction” design with teeth around the entire frame.  In short, it was designed to serve my purpose in an exceptional way.  I also expected to have the shoes for decades, perhaps handing them down to my son should he want them.

I probably would not have dropped the full retail price ($260-300); I wanted them, but did not need them.  I did, however, find a pair at one of the finest little shops in downtown Colorado Springs, Mountain Chalet.  End of season – $105 off.  Um, OK.

Picked them up and took them out the same weekend for a visit to Horsethief Park and a climb to Sentinel Point with Matt Payne (side note: check out 100summits.com – a website he built from pure passion and no web design background to speak of prior to initiating the project).

The MSR Lightning Ascent performed beautifully on hard pack, soft snow, deep powder, ice, steep slopes and all else we encountered.  Though only about 3 miles to Sentinel Point, the elevation gain is about 3,000ft.  Much of that gain is in the last mile and a half.  The heel lift proved to be an extremely valuable feature.

Approaching Sentinel Point, west side of Pikes Peak

Approaching Sentinel Point on the west side of Pikes Peak

Said what it was.  Did what it said.  Solved my problem.  Exceeded my expectations.  That’s what I got in the purchase.

Worth noting: they have a similar similar design at a lower price point in the Denali Ascent and Denali Evo Ascent.

Here’s a photo set from the hike.

Like Son, Don’t Like Father: Berman

A follow up to an earlier post – “Like Father, Like Son” – about writer/producer/director John Hughes Jr and his son, John Hughes III.  This time: the Bermans.

BermanSonFather

David Berman has served as the driving force behind Silver Jews, a band with which I became familiar through the involvement of Pavement’s Stephen Malkmus.  In generic terms, they play independent pop/rock/folk.  I’m not an especially well-versed or dedicated fan of Silver Jews, however their “American Water” (1998) really resonated with me.  It’s an album to which I continue to listen.

Over a six-album, fourteen-year career, their approach has been literary (poetic at a minimum) and the music hook-laden; I can appreciate the work.

Berman resisted playing live for many, many years.  He unceremoniously ended the project in January, 2009, at which time he gave a few interviews and revealed a rift between himself and his father, Richard Berman.  What I call a rift, you might call something else.  Of his father, he wrote on his record label’s message board:

“My father is a despicable man.  My father is a sort of human molestor.  An exploiter.  A scoundrel.  A world historical motherf*cking son of a b*itch.  (sorry grandma)”

This expression follows a threat to sever their relationship and a 3-years-and-counting estrangement between these Bermans.

What’s the problem with Richard Berman?  In his son’s words:

“He props up fast food/soda/factory farming/childhood obesity and diabetes/drunk driving/secondhand smoke.

He attacks animal lovers, ecologists, civil action attorneys, scientists, dieticians, doctors, teachers.

His clients include everyone from the makers of Agent Orange to the Tanning Salon Owners of America.

He helped ensure the minimum wage did not move a penny from 1997-2007!”

Richard’s a lawyer and lobbyist, a “hired gun” and “major tool for corporate America,” according to 60 Minutes.  A nickname he celebrates: “Dr. Evil.”  Because many companies and industries don’t dare fight some fights themselves, they employ an ingenious system he’s devised to create front organizations with innocuous names to “educate” us.

Berman and Company is a PR firm.  How they’re positioned on their home page:

“Berman and Company is a dynamic research, communications, advertising and government affairs firm.  Our mission is to ‘change the debate’ … we don’t just change the debate.  If necessary, we start the debate.”

An over-simplified demonstration of the power of this idea:  the semantic shift from “inheritance” or “estate” tax to “death” tax.  The debate has been changed simply by changing the language.  A “death” tax is now popularly opposed, even by millions who have no expectation whatsoever of an inheritance, an estate, or a tax liability.  I have no particular feelings about such a tax; this simply demonstrates how people can be led to feel and act in others’ interests through language and positioning.  *Berman was in no way involved in the renaming of the estate tax; follow to read a little about the origin of these semantics.*

So:  if public opinion is swaying against your financial interests and the topic is too hot for your company to touch openly, Berman’s built the kind of operation you hire … smart, connected, and clever.  They tend to position any and every form of regulation as evidence that America’s becoming a “Nanny State.”  In doing so, they render regulation unnecessary and insulting.  Their clients line up behind this position to protect or advance their financial interests … or at least to throw up an obfuscating smoke screen.

I’m not a fan of regulation, but often accept it as necessary (ineptitude and lack of enforcement are fundamental problems).  I won’t touch death and taxes.  I won’t touch the ethics of “anything for a dollar,” nor corporations’ inherent inability to hold values, ethical or otherwise.  I won’t touch the “Nanny State” arguments.  Instead, I will return to the fascinating story here – a father and a son divided fundamentally by opposing world views.

Bottom line: incredibly sad and wonderfully human.

Please share your thoughts with a comment.

Fronts created by Richard:  BermanExposed.org

Richard’s company website: BermanCo.com

60 Minutes interviews Richard: “Dr Evil” Interview with 60 Minutes

David’s Silver Jews: silverjews.net

Test My Emissions, Please!

Tailpipe

Some initiatives should not be undertaken.  A primary consideration: the level of difficulty or expense of getting it up and running relative to the ultimate benefit or payoff of the initiative.

Killing off an initiative that’s running effectively?  Painful to watch.

Premise of this entire post: beautifully clear, blue skies and clean, mountain air are significant selling points to those considering moving to or even visiting the Pikes Peak region.

When I arrived in Colorado Springs in September 2006, I had to have my vehicle’s emissions tested prior to earning a Colorado license plate.  I was registering a 1997 Dodge Stratus, neither a new nor high-quality vehicle.  The $25 test seemed reasonable and fair.

I was among the last people to have his or her car’s emissions tested.

These tests had been required in El Paso County since 1982, either annually or bienially depending on the age of the car.  These tests were killed off when the program that required them (which had the fantastic acronym AIR) expired.

Primary arguments in support of eliminating emissions tests: advances in fuel and engine technologies made emissions cleaner and regional air quality was within federal safety standards.

My thoughts about continuing the program: a network of test-providers had been built – just about every auto service shop could execute it.  The program was apparently effective.  The county got a cut of each test; why cut off even a modest source of funding?  Federal safety standards and general air quality “improvement” is an extremely conservative goal.

As the entire Front Range continues to develop into one Megalopolis from Fort Collins to Pueblo, the beauty of our region and health of our neighbors should remain top concerns.  Why settle for simple, measurable “improvement?”  Why not seek perpetually cleaner?

From a marketing standpoint, why shouldn’t the Pikes Peak region aspire to and work toward “the clearest skies in the Rockies” or the “cleanest air in the West?”  Colorado is as much as state of mind as it is a physical place or U.S. state; inspiring, majestic views and impossibly blue skies are the foundation of this concept.

To connect back to the introduction: I understand not initiating an emissions testing program because it’s complicated and costly.  However, I can’t understand killing one off once it’s successfully up and running.

Rather than kill the program, modifications would have been preferred by this writer and local resident.

Two obvious, potential modifications: limit the age of cars that require testing, excluding the newest vehicles completely – and/or – extend the periods of time between required tests from one or two years to three or four years.

Once the program is killed, all momentum is lost.  When we lose our views to haze or suffer more respiratory ills, the program will be much more difficult and costly to reinstate.

Further reading:

Press Release: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment

Newspaper Article: Colorado Springs Gazette from BNET (contains additional, related links)

Newer posts »

© 2024 ethanbeute

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑