Marketing | Environment | Culture

Category: Culture (Page 12 of 12)

video, music, art, photography, language, creativity, creative expression

Like Son, Don’t Like Father: Berman

A follow up to an earlier post – “Like Father, Like Son” – about writer/producer/director John Hughes Jr and his son, John Hughes III.  This time: the Bermans.

BermanSonFather

David Berman has served as the driving force behind Silver Jews, a band with which I became familiar through the involvement of Pavement’s Stephen Malkmus.  In generic terms, they play independent pop/rock/folk.  I’m not an especially well-versed or dedicated fan of Silver Jews, however their “American Water” (1998) really resonated with me.  It’s an album to which I continue to listen.

Over a six-album, fourteen-year career, their approach has been literary (poetic at a minimum) and the music hook-laden; I can appreciate the work.

Berman resisted playing live for many, many years.  He unceremoniously ended the project in January, 2009, at which time he gave a few interviews and revealed a rift between himself and his father, Richard Berman.  What I call a rift, you might call something else.  Of his father, he wrote on his record label’s message board:

“My father is a despicable man.  My father is a sort of human molestor.  An exploiter.  A scoundrel.  A world historical motherf*cking son of a b*itch.  (sorry grandma)”

This expression follows a threat to sever their relationship and a 3-years-and-counting estrangement between these Bermans.

What’s the problem with Richard Berman?  In his son’s words:

“He props up fast food/soda/factory farming/childhood obesity and diabetes/drunk driving/secondhand smoke.

He attacks animal lovers, ecologists, civil action attorneys, scientists, dieticians, doctors, teachers.

His clients include everyone from the makers of Agent Orange to the Tanning Salon Owners of America.

He helped ensure the minimum wage did not move a penny from 1997-2007!”

Richard’s a lawyer and lobbyist, a “hired gun” and “major tool for corporate America,” according to 60 Minutes.  A nickname he celebrates: “Dr. Evil.”  Because many companies and industries don’t dare fight some fights themselves, they employ an ingenious system he’s devised to create front organizations with innocuous names to “educate” us.

Berman and Company is a PR firm.  How they’re positioned on their home page:

“Berman and Company is a dynamic research, communications, advertising and government affairs firm.  Our mission is to ‘change the debate’ … we don’t just change the debate.  If necessary, we start the debate.”

An over-simplified demonstration of the power of this idea:  the semantic shift from “inheritance” or “estate” tax to “death” tax.  The debate has been changed simply by changing the language.  A “death” tax is now popularly opposed, even by millions who have no expectation whatsoever of an inheritance, an estate, or a tax liability.  I have no particular feelings about such a tax; this simply demonstrates how people can be led to feel and act in others’ interests through language and positioning.  *Berman was in no way involved in the renaming of the estate tax; follow to read a little about the origin of these semantics.*

So:  if public opinion is swaying against your financial interests and the topic is too hot for your company to touch openly, Berman’s built the kind of operation you hire … smart, connected, and clever.  They tend to position any and every form of regulation as evidence that America’s becoming a “Nanny State.”  In doing so, they render regulation unnecessary and insulting.  Their clients line up behind this position to protect or advance their financial interests … or at least to throw up an obfuscating smoke screen.

I’m not a fan of regulation, but often accept it as necessary (ineptitude and lack of enforcement are fundamental problems).  I won’t touch death and taxes.  I won’t touch the ethics of “anything for a dollar,” nor corporations’ inherent inability to hold values, ethical or otherwise.  I won’t touch the “Nanny State” arguments.  Instead, I will return to the fascinating story here – a father and a son divided fundamentally by opposing world views.

Bottom line: incredibly sad and wonderfully human.

Please share your thoughts with a comment.

Fronts created by Richard:  BermanExposed.org

Richard’s company website: BermanCo.com

60 Minutes interviews Richard: “Dr Evil” Interview with 60 Minutes

David’s Silver Jews: silverjews.net

A Radical Blackfoot on the Economics of Globalization

My impression is that Jim Craven (Omahkohkiaayo i’poyi) has deliverd this lecture several times.  If not, it’s all the more impressive.  He’s a member of the Blackfoot Nation and holds US and Canadian citizenships.  Craven’s earned at least a half dozen undergraduate and graduate degrees in a variety of fields and at the time of this presentation was a Professor of Economics and Chairman of the Business Division at Clark College in Vancouver, Washington.

This video was brought to my attention about a year ago by a fellow UCCS MBA student.  I’ve seen it a few times since then for its breadth, depth and entertainment value.  It’s certainly academic, but connects to the everyday and to common experience frequently enough to guide you through.

If you don’t have the time or patience for this now, bookmark it and come back.  If you do have the time, share your thoughts.  Enjoy! 

Like Father, Like Son: Hughes

The recent passing of John Huges brought an outpouring of memories and appreciation from all kinds of people, all over the world, on all the social platforms.  A wildly-celebrated American filmmaker, Hughes directed many 80’s classics, including this amazing run:

Sixteen Candles (1984), The Breakfast Club (1985), Weird Science (1986), Ferris Bueller’s Day Off (1987), Planes, Trains and Automobiles (1987)

His credits as writer and producer are even more impressive.  His greatest commercial success, Home Alone, has become a holiday classic.  Full career details can be reviewed here on his IMDB page.

Born John Wilden Hughes, Jr, in Lansing, Michigan, he built his career and filmed extensively in Chicago, Illinois.  His films raised a mirror to 80’s teen culture and employed music quite rightly and very smartly.  It’s no coincidence that his son, John Hughes III, is a wonderfully creative musician living, working, and running a record label in Chicago.

Father and Son: Hughes

From Carl Sandburg’s “City of the Big Shoulders” comes Hefty Records, created and run by John Hughes III.  Specializing in electronic and experimental music, the label’s current concept of self is “Future Roots Music.”  The concept’s best exemplified in the album “We All Have a Plan” by Slicker (Hughes’ recording name).  Think: the intersection of pop, dub, jazz, hip hop and electronic.

I really love that album, except for – somewhat surprisingly – the first single.  I own many Hefty releases, including those from Telefon Tel Aviv, Solo Andata, L’Altra, Phil Ranelin, and, of course, Slicker.  I’ve seen many Hefty performances, most memorably series of sets at a 2001 summer solstice party at the Museum of Contemporary Art in Chicago.  I greatly admired Hefty’s reissuing and re-mixing of the work of Detroit trombonist Phil Ranelin, introducing it to new audiences in new ways.

The point of the post: to recognize and celebrate the work of both men, father and son, pursuing personal passions to the benefit of us all.

A couple links (just click the description):

A rare John Huges interview in which he discusses “Reach the Rock,” which incorporates Chicago, his son, music, and indie filmmaking.

The Chicagoist interviews John Hughes III on the 10th anniversary of Hefty Records.

UP NEXT: an interesting “Like Son, Don’t Like Father” post about a musician and a crafty bastard, respectively.

Be a Winner at the Game of Life

One of the game our family plays at home is one you might remember: “Life.”

I played it as a kid and fondly recall this 80’s jingle, imploring you to “be a winner at the game of Life:”

Life has since been updated.  We’ve got a 2007 edition with updated scenarios (“Buy an SUV!  Pay $40,000” or “Win a TV Singing Contest!  Collect $100,000”), as well as more current jobs, costs, salaries, graphics, and more.  The awesome, spinning wheel in the center of the board and charming, plastic buildings and mountains remain.

The Game of Life

Our 6-year-old loves the game, serves as banker, and frequently wins.  The question: is he learning the right Life lessons!?

At the outset, you decide if you want to borrow $100,000 to attend college, increasing the likelihood you land a higher paying job, or if you want to head straight into the working world debt-free.  Marriage, homebuying, children, and grandchildren arrive in sequence.  Various opportunities and pitfalls await.  You earn valuable “Life” chips when you vote, learn sign language, visit a foreign country, or similar.

Basic takeaways: go to school, get a decent job, earn a respectable wage, expect some bumps along the road … basic, traditional, and straighforward.

Owen’s takeaway: Spin to Win!

Interestingly, in earlier editions of the game, this “Spin to Win” portion of the game was positioned as “playing the stock market.”  Now – it’s transparently a straight-up gamble – a 1 in 10 chance that pays back 10x over.  You’re in a much better position – 4 in 10 chance – if you’ve got a special card that allows you to place your bet on 4 numbers instead of just 1.

The Game of Life - Spin to Win

Example: someone lands on a Spin to Win space.  You opt to participate.  You put $100,000 on “2.”  The spin stops at “2” – you get $1,000,000.

Owen recently won a game with more than $9,000,000!  There isn’t enough cash in the bank to cover that, nor are there enough high-end properties (Mansion, Penthouse, Luxury Mountain Retreat) to hold that value.

A year ago, when we first started playing, a winning score was more like $1,725,000.  However, it has since become obvious to our child that putting it all out there at every opportunity is the recipe for success.

At this point, each of us has no chance of winning the game of “Life” without taking an aggressive approach to “Spin to Win.”  This new practice is dictated by the play of our child.

If you want to “be a winner at the game of Life,” you have to gamble big and gamble often.

Do you think that’s a good lesson?

Newer posts »

© 2024 ethanbeute

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑